Composite
68.4 / 100 percentile
Screener / 305060
C
BEDFORD HILLS CENTER
snfNH
30 COLBY COURT, BEDFORD, NH 03110 · CCN 305060 · chain 603 HEALTHCARE LLC
Peer group
snf n = 14,684
Evidence depth
deep
Certified beds
147
Model
v1.2
Reads as: riskier than 68.4% of the 14,684 facilities in the snf peer group. percentile within peer group, 100 = highest risk. Grade bands are fixed percentile cuts (F is the top 5% of peer risk), so a grade is a position, not an absolute level.
Score model5ML signals1Components16CHOW radar1Distress radar1Staffing16Penalties1Deficiencies8Licensure0Ownership17Related party5Transactions1Comps12Market rent29
Composite explanation
5| Component | Percentile | Raw | Weight | Weight share | Contribution | Counts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| staffing risk | 71.9 | 71.9 | 0.25 | 0.1923 | 13.83 | in index |
| regulatory risk | 57.4 | 47.6 | 0.30 | 0.2308 | 13.25 | in index |
| billing conduct | 51.0 | 39.8 | 0.30 | 0.2308 | 11.77 | in index |
| financial risk | 46.2 | 43.2 | 0.30 | 0.2308 | 10.66 | in index |
| chow risk | 50.5 | 48.7 | 0.15 | 0.1154 | 5.83 | in index |
weighted_contribution sums to pre_rank_index over rows where counts_toward_index is true. The composite is the facility's percentile position of that index within its peer group, so contributions explain the input, and the rank explains the score.
ML signals — parallel engine
1| Kind | Finding | Signal | Subject | First seen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| connection | Owner fleet risk far above national | +21.2 vs natl | OJUTALAYO AYOBAMI | 5 facilities |
Findings from the always-on scanning layer: anomalies on this facility, connections through its current owners and past buyers. Runs beside the deterministic composite, never inside it. Full board on the ML Lab page.
Component scores and registry models
16| Score type | Score | Grade | Model | Status | Registry model notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| billing conduct | 39.8 | B | v0.1-pacpuf-snf | default · in composite | R22. PAC PUF SNF 2023. PDPM coding intensity vs acuity, stay length, charge markup. |
| chow risk | 25.0 | B | v0.1-pos | default · in composite | Change-of-ownership footprint in the CMS Provider of Services file: control-family, legal-name and address deltas across quarterly snapshots, plus certification reset recency and Medicare tenure. |
| chow risk | 72.3 | D | v0.6 | default · in composite | |
| financial risk | 43.2 | B | v0.5 | default · in composite | R18. |
| p adverse action 12m | 0.1 | — | v0.1 | default · in composite | R23/W4-3. Deterministic logistic p(Medicare termination within 12m), SNF only. Label = first POS termination date (any code: voluntary closure, involuntary termination, merger exit); facilities already terminated by the panel date are excluded, not counted as safe. Trained on panels 2024-07/2024-10/2025-01 (n=46,466, 283 positives), evaluated on the held-out later panel 2025-04 BEFORE shipping: AUC 0.971, top-decile lift 9.5x, top-decile capture 95.4% of the 65 terminations that followed. Separability is high because closures announce themselves in the data: collapsing occupancy is the strongest signal, and the learned NEGATIVE weight on 12m deficiency counts is the surveys-stop signature of a facility winding down, not a claim that clean inspections are dangerous. Same 15 as-of-date features and anti-leakage chassis as p_chow_12m; SFF entry rejected as a label (only one month of SFF history exists, so as-of transitions cannot be reconstructed). Score = probability x 100; grade NULL. Not in any composite. |
| p chow 12m | 0.0 | — | v0.1 | default · in composite | R22/W4-2. Deterministic logistic p(CHOW within 12m), SNF only. Trained on panels 2024-07/2024-10/2025-01 (n=50,700, 1,207 positives), evaluated on the held-out later panel 2025-04 BEFORE shipping: AUC 0.874, top-decile lift 5.0x (top 10% of predictions captured 49.6% of the CHOWs that actually closed in the next 12 months). Shipped coefficients are the evaluated ones; no post-holdout refit. Caveat: holdout positives (133) run below the training base rate because recent CHOWs surface in public records with a lag, so measured lift is conservative. Features are as-of-date public records: PBJ staffing level/trend/contract share (quarterly history to 2022Q1), deficiency and CMP counts (12m), ownership tenure and churn from CHOW-evidenced transactions, beds, occupancy, ownership type, chain size. Chain membership and ownership type are current-state (history not published). SFF and star ratings deliberately excluded (no as-of history). Notable learned direction: long ownership tenure RAISES sale odds and a recent prior CHOW lowers them. Score = probability x 100; grade is NULL because a probability is not a quality letter. Not in any composite. |
| regulatory risk | 47.6 | C | v0.3 | default · in composite | Deficiency-based, SNF population. Runs alongside v0.5-pos. |
| staffing risk | 71.9 | D | v0.3 | default · in composite | Cost-report staffing, SNF population. Runs alongside v0.4-pos, which covers ICF/IID from POS. |
| financial risk | 87.3 | F | v0.1 | superseded | Pre-registry model iteration, superseded by a later financial_risk rebuild. Rows retained for audit per project convention (see regulatory_risk v0.4-pos); never consumed because v_cii_api_facility_score and the composite eligibility join both require status = default. Backfilled 2026-07-26 by alert triage on model_registry_integrity. |
| financial risk | 67.3 | D | v0.2 | superseded | Pre-registry model iteration, superseded by a later financial_risk rebuild. Rows retained for audit per project convention (see regulatory_risk v0.4-pos); never consumed because v_cii_api_facility_score and the composite eligibility join both require status = default. Backfilled 2026-07-26 by alert triage on model_registry_integrity. |
| financial risk | 61.4 | C | v0.3 | superseded | Pre-registry model iteration, superseded by a later financial_risk rebuild. Rows retained for audit per project convention (see regulatory_risk v0.4-pos); never consumed because v_cii_api_facility_score and the composite eligibility join both require status = default. Backfilled 2026-07-26 by alert triage on model_registry_integrity. |
| financial risk | 44.7 | B | v0.4 | superseded | Pre-registry model iteration, superseded by a later financial_risk rebuild. Rows retained for audit per project convention (see regulatory_risk v0.4-pos); never consumed because v_cii_api_facility_score and the composite eligibility join both require status = default. Backfilled 2026-07-26 by alert triage on model_registry_integrity. |
| regulatory risk | 47.4 | C | v0.1 | superseded | Pre-registry model iteration, superseded by a later regulatory_risk rebuild. Rows retained for audit per project convention (see regulatory_risk v0.4-pos); never consumed because v_cii_api_facility_score and the composite eligibility join both require status = default. Backfilled 2026-07-26 by alert triage on model_registry_integrity. |
| regulatory risk | 47.4 | C | v0.2 | superseded | Pre-registry model iteration, superseded by a later regulatory_risk rebuild. Rows retained for audit per project convention (see regulatory_risk v0.4-pos); never consumed because v_cii_api_facility_score and the composite eligibility join both require status = default. Backfilled 2026-07-26 by alert triage on model_registry_integrity. |
| staffing risk | 71.9 | D | v0.1 | superseded | Pre-registry model iteration, superseded by a later staffing_risk rebuild. Rows retained for audit per project convention (see regulatory_risk v0.4-pos); never consumed because v_cii_api_facility_score and the composite eligibility join both require status = default. Backfilled 2026-07-26 by alert triage on model_registry_integrity. |
| staffing risk | 71.9 | D | v0.2 | superseded | Pre-registry model iteration, superseded by a later staffing_risk rebuild. Rows retained for audit per project convention (see regulatory_risk v0.4-pos); never consumed because v_cii_api_facility_score and the composite eligibility join both require status = default. Backfilled 2026-07-26 by alert triage on model_registry_integrity. |
Rows with counts_toward_composite false come from models that are addressable or retracted rather than default. They exist and may be informative, but they did not enter the published composite and must not be summed as though they had.
CHOW radar — 12-month sale probability
full board →p(CHOW, 12m)
0.0%
model v0.1 · computed 2026-07-29
Percentile among SNFs
1.1
100 = most likely to sell
Holdout AUC
0.874
evaluated before shipping, never refit
| Driver | Value | Pull on odds | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Current owner tenure (years) | 1.91 | -1.66 | |
| Never sold on record | 0.00 | -1.62 | |
| Ownership changes, last 5 years | 1.00 | -0.87 | |
| For-profit ownership | 1.00 | +0.69 | |
| Occupancy | 0.90 | -0.60 | |
| No PBJ staffing report | 0.00 | +0.42 | |
| Deficiencies, last 12 months | 0.00 | -0.17 | |
| Facility size (log beds) | 5.00 | -0.10 |
p_adverse_action_12m: probability the facility's Medicare participation terminates within 12 months (any POS termination code; already-terminated facilities are excluded, not scored safe). Deterministic logistic over as-of-date public records, SNF only. Holdout (2025-04 panel, evaluated before shipping): AUC 0.971, top-decile lift 9.5x. Closures announce themselves: collapsing occupancy dominates, and fewer recent surveys is a winding-down signature. inputs.features holds raw feature values, inputs.contributions each feature's standardized pull on the log-odds. Predictions never enter the composite. See /v1/models. | p_chow_12m: probability of a change of ownership within 12 months. Deterministic logistic over as-of-date public records, SNF only. Holdout (2025-04 panel, evaluated before shipping): AUC 0.874, top-decile lift 5.0x. inputs.features holds raw feature values, inputs.contributions each feature's standardized pull on the log-odds. Predictions never enter the composite. See /v1/models for full notes.
Distress radar — 12-month termination probability
full board →p(termination, 12m)
0.1%
model v0.1 · computed 2026-07-29
Percentile among SNFs
44.6
100 = most likely to lose certification
Holdout AUC
0.971
top decile caught 95% of actual exits
| Driver | Value | Pull on odds | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Deficiencies, last 12 months | 0.00 | +1.43 | |
| For-profit ownership | 1.00 | -0.69 | |
| Occupancy | 0.90 | -0.65 | |
| No PBJ staffing report | 0.00 | +0.39 | |
| Never sold on record | 0.00 | -0.28 | |
| Current owner tenure (years) | 1.91 | -0.27 | |
| Ownership changes, last 5 years | 1.00 | +0.23 | |
| Fine amount, 12m (log) | 0.00 | +0.18 |
Probability the facility's Medicare participation ends within 12 months, from public records only. Red bars raise exit odds. A negative pull from deficiencies is the winding-down signature — surveys stop as a facility empties — not evidence that clean inspections are dangerous.
Staffing vs peers
16| 2025Q4 HPRD | This facility | NH median | National median | National p25–p75 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse | 2.96 | 3.28 | 3.28 | 2.90–3.77 |
| RN | 0.57 | 0.52 | 0.39 | 0.25–0.58 |
| Weekend total | 2.83 | 3.14 | 3.11 | — |
| Weekday total | 3.01 | 3.32 | 3.35 | — |
| Quarter | Days | Avg census | Total HPRD | RN | LPN | CNA | Weekend | Contract % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025Q4 | 92 | 132.9 | 2.96 | 0.57 | 0.86 | 1.53 | 2.83 | 0.0% |
| 2025Q3 | 92 | 136.8 | 2.96 | 0.54 | 0.85 | 1.56 | 2.80 | 0.3% |
| 2025Q2 | 91 | 135.1 | 2.93 | 0.55 | 0.90 | 1.49 | 2.76 | 0.4% |
| 2025Q1 | 90 | 140.5 | 2.93 | 0.59 | 0.87 | 1.47 | 2.79 | 2.5% |
| 2024Q4 | 92 | 138.3 | 2.92 | 0.64 | 0.80 | 1.48 | 2.76 | 3.9% |
| 2024Q3 | 92 | 134.9 | 3.15 | 0.74 | 0.84 | 1.57 | 2.94 | 6.2% |
| 2024Q2 | 91 | 133.7 | 3.20 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 1.63 | 2.98 | 4.1% |
| 2024Q1 | 91 | 139.1 | 3.24 | 0.75 | 0.87 | 1.62 | 3.00 | 8.2% |
| 2023Q4 | 92 | 140.1 | 3.21 | 0.76 | 0.92 | 1.53 | 2.99 | 6.0% |
| 2023Q3 | 92 | 139.3 | 3.13 | 0.76 | 0.84 | 1.52 | 2.90 | 1.1% |
| 2023Q2 | 91 | 138.8 | 3.17 | 0.77 | 0.94 | 1.46 | 2.92 | 1.4% |
| 2023Q1 | 90 | 137.4 | 3.35 | 0.73 | 0.95 | 1.67 | 3.13 | 2.4% |
| 2022Q4 | 92 | 136.0 | 3.21 | 0.65 | 0.87 | 1.69 | 3.04 | 3.4% |
| 2022Q3 | 92 | 139.1 | 3.06 | 0.43 | 0.91 | 1.72 | 3.01 | 7.8% |
| 2022Q2 | 91 | 136.1 | 3.05 | 0.44 | 0.81 | 1.80 | 2.96 | 2.3% |
| 2022Q1 | 90 | 135.2 | 3.20 | 0.49 | 0.80 | 1.91 | 3.10 | 1.7% |
HPRD is census-weighted: total hours over the quarter divided by total resident-days, not an average of daily ratios. Source is CMS Payroll-Based Journal daily records; only SNFs report PBJ, so other settings legitimately return zero rows.
Penalties
1| Date | Type | Fine | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-22 | Fine | $16,452 | CMS provider data |
Total fines on record: $16,452
Deficiencies
8B × 2D × 5J × 1
deficiencies by survey year
| Survey | Type | Tag | Deficiency | Scope | Corrected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-03 | Health · complaint | F0760 | Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors. | D | 2024-09-09 |
| 2024-07-31 | Health | F0552 | Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments. | D | 2024-07-31 |
| 2024-07-31 | Health | F0582 | Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered. | B | 2024-08-16 |
| 2024-07-31 | Health | F0641 | Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment. | B | 2024-08-21 |
| 2024-07-31 | Health | F0761 | Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs. | D | 2024-08-28 |
| 2024-05-22 | Health · complaint | F0760 | Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors. | J | 2024-04-02 |
| 2023-06-29 | Health | F0658 | Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality. | D | 2023-08-18 |
| 2023-06-29 | Health · complaint | F0677 | Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable. | D | 2023-07-26 |
scope_severity uses the CMS letter grid: A is least serious, L most. J, K and L are immediate jeopardy. Rows are the surveyor's findings of record, not the model's opinion.
Licensure actions
0No licensure actions on record for this facility. Absence of a record here means the sources CII ingests contain none, not that none exists anywhere.
Ownership
17| Owner | Role | Pct | From | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BLACK MOUNTAIN PEAK HEALTHCARE, LLC | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | 2024-01-25 | current | pecos_ownership |
| PR NH HOLDINGS LLC | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 48% | 2024-02-19 | current | pecos_ownership |
| RR NH HOLDINGS LLC | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 48% | 2024-02-19 | current | pecos_ownership |
| 603 HEALTHCARE LLC | ADP OF THE SNF | — | 2025-01-29 | current | pecos_ownership |
| 603 HEALTHCARE LLC | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | 2024-09-01 | current | pecos_ownership |
| FORRENCE, HEIDI | ADP OF THE SNF | — | 2024-09-01 | current | pecos_ownership |
| OJUTALAYO, AYOBAMI | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | 2025-02-01 | current | pecos_ownership |
| RAUSMAN, PHILIP | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | 2024-02-19 | current | pecos_ownership |
| RAUSMAN, ROBERT | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | 2024-02-19 | current | pecos_ownership |
| STEVENSON, SEAN | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | 2024-09-01 | current | pecos_ownership |
| STEVENSON, SEAN | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | 2024-02-19 | current | pecos_ownership |
| PHILIP RAUSMAN | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 48% | 2024-02-19 | ended 2026-05-18 | pecos_ownership |
| ROBERT RAUSMAN | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 48% | 2024-02-19 | ended 2026-05-18 | pecos_ownership |
| SEAN STEVENSON | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 5% | 2024-02-19 | ended 2026-05-18 | pecos_ownership |
| AYOBAMI OJUTALAYO | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | 2025-02-01 | ended 2026-05-18 | pecos_ownership |
| HEIDI FORRENCE | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | 2024-09-01 | ended 2026-05-18 | pecos_ownership |
| SEAN STEVENSON | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | 2024-09-01 | ended 2026-05-18 | pecos_ownership |
PECOS ownership and managing-control associations. Current edges have no end date in the source; historical edges are retained.
Transactions
1| Close date | Price | Buyer | Seller | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-01 | — | BEDFORD HILLS SNF OPCO LLC | HARBORSIDE NEW HAMPSHIRE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP | chow |
Comparable trades — NH snf
12| Close | Facility | Price | $/bed | Cap rate | Beds | Buyer |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-06-05 | Nashua Post Acute Care | — | — | — | 290 | PREMIER OPERATOR LLC |
| 2024-11-01 | Pleasant Valley Nursing and Rehab Center | — | — | — | 112 | PLEASANT VALLEY OPCO LLC |
| 2024-11-01 | WOODLAWN HEALTHCARE CENTER LLC | — | — | — | 53 | WOODLAWN HEALTHCARE CENTER LLC |
| 2024-09-01 | WOLFEBORO BAY CENTER | — | — | — | 104 | WOLFEBORO SNF OPCO LLC |
| 2024-09-01 | LANGDON PLACE OF DOVER | — | — | — | 30 | DOVER SNF OPCO LLC |
| 2024-09-01 | MINERAL SPRINGS | — | — | — | 87 | NORTH CONWAY SNF OPCO LLC |
| 2024-09-01 | BEDFORD HILLS CENTERthis facility | — | — | — | 147 | BEDFORD HILLS SNF OPCO LLC |
| 2024-09-01 | LANGDON PLACE OF KEENE | — | — | — | 25 | KEENE SNF OPCO LLC |
| 2023-02-01 | BEDFORD NURSING & REHABILITATION CENTER | — | — | — | 102 | BEDFORD SNF OPCO LLC |
| 2022-07-08 | GOFFSTOWN NURSING AND REHAB CENTER | — | — | — | 41 | MORE COWBELL LLC |
| 2022-01-11 | DERRY CENTER FOR REHABILITATION AND HEALTHCARE | — | — | — | 62 | DERRY REHABILITATION AND NURSING CENTER LLC |
| 2021-07-01 | LAFAYETTE CENTER | — | — | — | 72 | LAFAYETTE OPERATING GROUP LLC |
Most recent same-state, same-setting trades. Most CHOW-derived trades carry no disclosed consideration, so price, $/bed, and cap rate show only where a sale price was resolved from a deed or filing — blanks are honest, not missing data.
Market rent context
29| Geo | Kind | BR | Amount | As of | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| county 33011 | acs median gross | 0 | $1,194 | 2024-12-31 | CENSUS_ACS5 |
| county 33011 | acs median gross | 1 | $1,296 | 2024-12-31 | CENSUS_ACS5 |
| county 33011 | acs median gross | 2 | $1,722 | 2024-12-31 | CENSUS_ACS5 |
| county 33011 | acs median gross | 3 | $1,835 | 2024-12-31 | CENSUS_ACS5 |
| county 33011 | acs median gross | 4 | $2,025 | 2024-12-31 | CENSUS_ACS5 |
| county 33011 | acs median gross | 5 | $1,566 | 2024-12-31 | CENSUS_ACS5 |
| county 33011 | acs median gross | $1,623 | 2024-12-31 | CENSUS_ACS5 | |
| county 33011 | acs recent mover gross | $1,932 | 2024-12-31 | CENSUS_ACS5 | |
| zcta 03110 | acs median gross | 1 | $1,678 | 2024-12-31 | CENSUS_ACS5 |
| zcta 03110 | acs median gross | 2 | $2,306 | 2024-12-31 | CENSUS_ACS5 |
| zcta 03110 | acs median gross | 3 | $2,673 | 2024-12-31 | CENSUS_ACS5 |
| zcta 03110 | acs median gross | 4 | $1,653 | 2024-12-31 | CENSUS_ACS5 |
| zcta 03110 | acs median gross | $2,099 | 2024-12-31 | CENSUS_ACS5 | |
| zcta 03110 | acs recent mover gross | $2,608 | 2024-12-31 | CENSUS_ACS5 | |
| zip 03110 | payment standard 110 | 0 | $2,189 | 2025-10-01 | HUD_USER_SAFMR |
| zip 03110 | payment standard 90 | 0 | $1,791 | 2025-10-01 | HUD_USER_SAFMR |
| zip 03110 | safmr | 0 | $1,990 | 2025-10-01 | HUD_USER_SAFMR |
| zip 03110 | payment standard 110 | 1 | $2,409 | 2025-10-01 | HUD_USER_SAFMR |
| zip 03110 | payment standard 90 | 1 | $1,971 | 2025-10-01 | HUD_USER_SAFMR |
| zip 03110 | safmr | 1 | $2,190 | 2025-10-01 | HUD_USER_SAFMR |
| zip 03110 | payment standard 110 | 2 | $3,168 | 2025-10-01 | HUD_USER_SAFMR |
| zip 03110 | payment standard 90 | 2 | $2,592 | 2025-10-01 | HUD_USER_SAFMR |
| zip 03110 | safmr | 2 | $2,880 | 2025-10-01 | HUD_USER_SAFMR |
| zip 03110 | payment standard 110 | 3 | $3,795 | 2025-10-01 | HUD_USER_SAFMR |
| zip 03110 | payment standard 90 | 3 | $3,105 | 2025-10-01 | HUD_USER_SAFMR |
| zip 03110 | safmr | 3 | $3,450 | 2025-10-01 | HUD_USER_SAFMR |
| zip 03110 | payment standard 110 | 4 | $4,191 | 2025-10-01 | HUD_USER_SAFMR |
| zip 03110 | payment standard 90 | 4 | $3,429 | 2025-10-01 | HUD_USER_SAFMR |
| zip 03110 | safmr | 4 | $3,810 | 2025-10-01 | HUD_USER_SAFMR |
ACS median gross rents and HUD FMR/SAFMR for the facility's county and ZIP. Context for underwriting, not facility pricing.