Composite
35.0 / 100 percentile
Screener / 145447
B
APERION CARE FOX RIVER
snfIL
355 RAYMOND STREET, ELGIN, IL 60120 · CCN 145447 · chain YOSEF MEYSTEL DELTA TRUST
Peer group
snf n = 14,684
Evidence depth
deep
Certified beds
94
Model
v1.2
Reads as: riskier than 35.0% of the 14,684 facilities in the snf peer group. percentile within peer group, 100 = highest risk. Grade bands are fixed percentile cuts (F is the top 5% of peer risk), so a grade is a position, not an absolute level.
Score model5ML signals25Components16CHOW radar1Distress radar1Staffing16Penalties0Deficiencies10Licensure0Ownership44Related party6Transactions1Comps12Market rent35
Composite explanation
5| Component | Percentile | Raw | Weight | Weight share | Contribution | Counts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| staffing risk | 80.3 | 80.3 | 0.25 | 0.1923 | 15.44 | in index |
| financial risk | 42.0 | 40.7 | 0.30 | 0.2308 | 9.69 | in index |
| billing conduct | 40.6 | 35.7 | 0.30 | 0.2308 | 9.37 | in index |
| regulatory risk | 18.6 | 12.1 | 0.30 | 0.2308 | 4.29 | in index |
| chow risk | 34.8 | 33.4 | 0.15 | 0.1154 | 4.02 | in index |
weighted_contribution sums to pre_rank_index over rows where counts_toward_index is true. The composite is the facility's percentile position of that index within its peer group, so contributions explain the input, and the rank explains the score.
ML signals — parallel engine
25| Kind | Finding | Signal | Subject | First seen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| connection | Owner fleet risk far above national | +32.8 vs natl | SEITLER DOVID | 35 facilities |
| connection | Owner fleet risk far above national | +32.7 vs natl | YOSEF MEYSTEL DELTA TRUST | 39 facilities |
| connection | Owner fleet risk far above national | +32.3 vs natl | DAVID A BERKOWITZ DELTA TRUST | 38 facilities |
| connection | Owner fleet risk far above national | +29.8 vs natl | APERION CARE EXEC HOLDINGS LLC | 26 facilities |
| connection | Owner fleet risk far above national | +29.7 vs natl | CHASE OFFICE LLC | 82 facilities |
| connection | Owner fleet risk far above national | +29.0 vs natl | JOSHUA HOFFMAN TRUST | 22 facilities |
| connection | Owner fleet risk far above national | +28.7 vs natl | WILHELM NAFTALI | 81 facilities |
| connection | Owner fleet risk far above national | +28.2 vs natl | CURIS SERVICES LLC | 85 facilities |
| connection | Owner fleet risk far above national | +28.1 vs natl | TUROFSKY STEVEN | 87 facilities |
| connection | Owner fleet risk far above national | +27.4 vs natl | SPECTOR JENNIFER | 93 facilities |
| connection | Owner fleet risk far above national | +26.4 vs natl | APERION CONSULTING LLC | 22 facilities |
| connection | Owner fleet risk far above national | +26.3 vs natl | BERKOWITZ DAVID | 77 facilities |
| connection | Owner fleet risk far above national | +26.2 vs natl | MEYSTEL YOSEF | 77 facilities |
| connection | Owner fleet risk far above national | +25.9 vs natl | APERION CARE INC | 29 facilities |
| connection | Owner fleet risk far above national | +25.4 vs natl | FRANKEL FREDERICK | 15 facilities |
| connection | Owner fleet risk far above national | +24.6 vs natl | ULBERT LISA | 30 facilities |
| connection | Owner fleet risk far above national | +24.4 vs natl | YOSEF MEYSTEL DECLARATION OF TR OF YOSEF MEYSTEL TTEE | 21 facilities |
| connection | Owner fleet risk far above national | +21.9 vs natl | GOLDFARB BRIAN | 30 facilities |
| connection | Owner spans multiple chains | 13 chains | CHASE OFFICE LLC | 75 facilities |
| connection | Owner spans multiple chains | 9 chains | SPECTOR JENNIFER | 90 facilities |
| connection | Owner spans multiple chains | 9 chains | TUROFSKY STEVEN | 84 facilities |
| connection | Owner spans multiple chains | 8 chains | APERION CARE INC | 28 facilities |
| connection | Owner spans multiple chains | 8 chains | WILHELM NAFTALI | 78 facilities |
| connection | Owner spans multiple chains | 8 chains | ULBERT LISA | 29 facilities |
| connection | Owner spans multiple chains | 8 chains | BERKOWITZ DAVID | 73 facilities |
Findings from the always-on scanning layer: anomalies on this facility, connections through its current owners and past buyers. Runs beside the deterministic composite, never inside it. Full board on the ML Lab page.
Component scores and registry models
16| Score type | Score | Grade | Model | Status | Registry model notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| billing conduct | 35.7 | B | v0.1-pacpuf-snf | default · in composite | R22. PAC PUF SNF 2023. PDPM coding intensity vs acuity, stay length, charge markup. |
| chow risk | 25.0 | B | v0.1-pos | default · in composite | Change-of-ownership footprint in the CMS Provider of Services file: control-family, legal-name and address deltas across quarterly snapshots, plus certification reset recency and Medicare tenure. |
| chow risk | 41.8 | B | v0.6 | default · in composite | |
| financial risk | 40.7 | B | v0.5 | default · in composite | R18. |
| p adverse action 12m | 0.0 | — | v0.1 | default · in composite | R23/W4-3. Deterministic logistic p(Medicare termination within 12m), SNF only. Label = first POS termination date (any code: voluntary closure, involuntary termination, merger exit); facilities already terminated by the panel date are excluded, not counted as safe. Trained on panels 2024-07/2024-10/2025-01 (n=46,466, 283 positives), evaluated on the held-out later panel 2025-04 BEFORE shipping: AUC 0.971, top-decile lift 9.5x, top-decile capture 95.4% of the 65 terminations that followed. Separability is high because closures announce themselves in the data: collapsing occupancy is the strongest signal, and the learned NEGATIVE weight on 12m deficiency counts is the surveys-stop signature of a facility winding down, not a claim that clean inspections are dangerous. Same 15 as-of-date features and anti-leakage chassis as p_chow_12m; SFF entry rejected as a label (only one month of SFF history exists, so as-of transitions cannot be reconstructed). Score = probability x 100; grade NULL. Not in any composite. |
| p chow 12m | 0.0 | — | v0.1 | default · in composite | R22/W4-2. Deterministic logistic p(CHOW within 12m), SNF only. Trained on panels 2024-07/2024-10/2025-01 (n=50,700, 1,207 positives), evaluated on the held-out later panel 2025-04 BEFORE shipping: AUC 0.874, top-decile lift 5.0x (top 10% of predictions captured 49.6% of the CHOWs that actually closed in the next 12 months). Shipped coefficients are the evaluated ones; no post-holdout refit. Caveat: holdout positives (133) run below the training base rate because recent CHOWs surface in public records with a lag, so measured lift is conservative. Features are as-of-date public records: PBJ staffing level/trend/contract share (quarterly history to 2022Q1), deficiency and CMP counts (12m), ownership tenure and churn from CHOW-evidenced transactions, beds, occupancy, ownership type, chain size. Chain membership and ownership type are current-state (history not published). SFF and star ratings deliberately excluded (no as-of history). Notable learned direction: long ownership tenure RAISES sale odds and a recent prior CHOW lowers them. Score = probability x 100; grade is NULL because a probability is not a quality letter. Not in any composite. |
| regulatory risk | 12.1 | A | v0.3 | default · in composite | Deficiency-based, SNF population. Runs alongside v0.5-pos. |
| staffing risk | 80.3 | F | v0.3 | default · in composite | Cost-report staffing, SNF population. Runs alongside v0.4-pos, which covers ICF/IID from POS. |
| financial risk | 76.4 | D | v0.1 | superseded | Pre-registry model iteration, superseded by a later financial_risk rebuild. Rows retained for audit per project convention (see regulatory_risk v0.4-pos); never consumed because v_cii_api_facility_score and the composite eligibility join both require status = default. Backfilled 2026-07-26 by alert triage on model_registry_integrity. |
| financial risk | 56.4 | C | v0.2 | superseded | Pre-registry model iteration, superseded by a later financial_risk rebuild. Rows retained for audit per project convention (see regulatory_risk v0.4-pos); never consumed because v_cii_api_facility_score and the composite eligibility join both require status = default. Backfilled 2026-07-26 by alert triage on model_registry_integrity. |
| financial risk | 43.2 | B | v0.3 | superseded | Pre-registry model iteration, superseded by a later financial_risk rebuild. Rows retained for audit per project convention (see regulatory_risk v0.4-pos); never consumed because v_cii_api_facility_score and the composite eligibility join both require status = default. Backfilled 2026-07-26 by alert triage on model_registry_integrity. |
| financial risk | 46.0 | C | v0.4 | superseded | Pre-registry model iteration, superseded by a later financial_risk rebuild. Rows retained for audit per project convention (see regulatory_risk v0.4-pos); never consumed because v_cii_api_facility_score and the composite eligibility join both require status = default. Backfilled 2026-07-26 by alert triage on model_registry_integrity. |
| regulatory risk | 12.0 | A | v0.1 | superseded | Pre-registry model iteration, superseded by a later regulatory_risk rebuild. Rows retained for audit per project convention (see regulatory_risk v0.4-pos); never consumed because v_cii_api_facility_score and the composite eligibility join both require status = default. Backfilled 2026-07-26 by alert triage on model_registry_integrity. |
| regulatory risk | 12.0 | A | v0.2 | superseded | Pre-registry model iteration, superseded by a later regulatory_risk rebuild. Rows retained for audit per project convention (see regulatory_risk v0.4-pos); never consumed because v_cii_api_facility_score and the composite eligibility join both require status = default. Backfilled 2026-07-26 by alert triage on model_registry_integrity. |
| staffing risk | 80.3 | F | v0.1 | superseded | Pre-registry model iteration, superseded by a later staffing_risk rebuild. Rows retained for audit per project convention (see regulatory_risk v0.4-pos); never consumed because v_cii_api_facility_score and the composite eligibility join both require status = default. Backfilled 2026-07-26 by alert triage on model_registry_integrity. |
| staffing risk | 80.3 | F | v0.2 | superseded | Pre-registry model iteration, superseded by a later staffing_risk rebuild. Rows retained for audit per project convention (see regulatory_risk v0.4-pos); never consumed because v_cii_api_facility_score and the composite eligibility join both require status = default. Backfilled 2026-07-26 by alert triage on model_registry_integrity. |
Rows with counts_toward_composite false come from models that are addressable or retracted rather than default. They exist and may be informative, but they did not enter the published composite and must not be summed as though they had.
CHOW radar — 12-month sale probability
full board →p(CHOW, 12m)
0.0%
model v0.1 · computed 2026-07-29
Percentile among SNFs
7.0
100 = most likely to sell
Holdout AUC
0.874
evaluated before shipping, never refit
| Driver | Value | Pull on odds | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Never sold on record | 0.00 | -1.62 | |
| Current owner tenure (years) | 3.08 | -1.55 | |
| Ownership changes, last 5 years | 1.00 | -0.87 | |
| For-profit ownership | 1.00 | +0.69 | |
| Occupancy | 0.88 | -0.53 | |
| No PBJ staffing report | 0.00 | +0.42 | |
| Chain size (log) | 3.53 | +0.35 | |
| Deficiencies, last 12 months | 0.00 | -0.17 |
p_adverse_action_12m: probability the facility's Medicare participation terminates within 12 months (any POS termination code; already-terminated facilities are excluded, not scored safe). Deterministic logistic over as-of-date public records, SNF only. Holdout (2025-04 panel, evaluated before shipping): AUC 0.971, top-decile lift 9.5x. Closures announce themselves: collapsing occupancy dominates, and fewer recent surveys is a winding-down signature. inputs.features holds raw feature values, inputs.contributions each feature's standardized pull on the log-odds. Predictions never enter the composite. See /v1/models. | p_chow_12m: probability of a change of ownership within 12 months. Deterministic logistic over as-of-date public records, SNF only. Holdout (2025-04 panel, evaluated before shipping): AUC 0.874, top-decile lift 5.0x. inputs.features holds raw feature values, inputs.contributions each feature's standardized pull on the log-odds. Predictions never enter the composite. See /v1/models for full notes.
Distress radar — 12-month termination probability
full board →p(termination, 12m)
0.0%
model v0.1 · computed 2026-07-29
Percentile among SNFs
33.6
100 = most likely to lose certification
Holdout AUC
0.971
top decile caught 95% of actual exits
| Driver | Value | Pull on odds | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Deficiencies, last 12 months | 0.00 | +1.43 | |
| Chain size (log) | 3.53 | -0.85 | |
| For-profit ownership | 1.00 | -0.69 | |
| Occupancy | 0.88 | -0.55 | |
| No PBJ staffing report | 0.00 | +0.39 | |
| Never sold on record | 0.00 | -0.28 | |
| Current owner tenure (years) | 3.08 | -0.25 | |
| Ownership changes, last 5 years | 1.00 | +0.23 |
Probability the facility's Medicare participation ends within 12 months, from public records only. Red bars raise exit odds. A negative pull from deficiencies is the winding-down signature — surveys stop as a facility empties — not evidence that clean inspections are dangerous.
Staffing vs peers
16| 2025Q4 HPRD | This facility | IL median | National median | National p25–p75 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse | 2.80 | 3.13 | 3.28 | 2.90–3.77 |
| RN | 0.77 | 0.49 | 0.39 | 0.25–0.58 |
| Weekend total | 2.82 | 2.93 | 3.11 | — |
| Weekday total | 2.79 | 3.23 | 3.35 | — |
| Quarter | Days | Avg census | Total HPRD | RN | LPN | CNA | Weekend | Contract % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025Q4 | 92 | 82.7 | 2.80 | 0.77 | 0.12 | 1.91 | 2.82 | 0.1% |
| 2025Q3 | 92 | 79.5 | 2.96 | 0.81 | 0.07 | 2.08 | 2.91 | 0.1% |
| 2025Q2 | 91 | 76.3 | 3.11 | 0.81 | 0.08 | 2.22 | 3.03 | 0.1% |
| 2025Q1 | 90 | 82.6 | 2.93 | 0.78 | 0.08 | 2.06 | 2.88 | 0.1% |
| 2024Q4 | 92 | 82.2 | 2.88 | 0.80 | 0.10 | 1.98 | 2.78 | 0.1% |
| 2024Q3 | 92 | 73.7 | 3.30 | 0.79 | 0.17 | 2.35 | 3.19 | 0.1% |
| 2024Q2 | 91 | 70.1 | 3.43 | 0.70 | 0.28 | 2.45 | 3.25 | 0.1% |
| 2024Q1 | 91 | 70.4 | 3.35 | 0.68 | 0.35 | 2.32 | 3.21 | 0.1% |
| 2023Q4 | 92 | 74.1 | 3.00 | 0.59 | 0.22 | 2.19 | 2.85 | 0.1% |
| 2023Q3 | 92 | 70.9 | 3.04 | 0.74 | 0.11 | 2.19 | 2.91 | 0.0% |
| 2023Q2 | 91 | 67.4 | 3.01 | 0.77 | 0.08 | 2.16 | 2.85 | 0.0% |
| 2023Q1 | 90 | 62.0 | 3.27 | 0.79 | 0.19 | 2.29 | 3.15 | 0.0% |
| 2022Q4 | 92 | 61.9 | 3.12 | 0.78 | 0.19 | 2.15 | 2.96 | 0.0% |
| 2022Q3 | 92 | 59.3 | 3.10 | 0.78 | 0.20 | 2.12 | 2.81 | 0.0% |
| 2022Q2 | 91 | 57.1 | 3.02 | 0.75 | 0.23 | 2.04 | 2.75 | 0.0% |
| 2022Q1 | 90 | 59.3 | 3.12 | 0.66 | 0.29 | 2.17 | 2.80 | 0.0% |
HPRD is census-weighted: total hours over the quarter divided by total resident-days, not an average of daily ratios. Source is CMS Payroll-Based Journal daily records; only SNFs report PBJ, so other settings legitimately return zero rows.
Penalties
0No penalties on record for this facility. Absence of a record here means the sources CII ingests contain none, not that none exists anywhere.
Deficiencies
10D × 6E × 2F × 2
deficiencies by survey year
| Survey | Type | Tag | Deficiency | Scope | Corrected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-03-13 | Health | F0689 | Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents. | D | 2025-03-18 |
| 2025-03-13 | Health | F0692 | Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health. | D | 2025-03-18 |
| 2025-03-13 | Health | F0880 | Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program. | F | 2025-03-18 |
| 2024-05-17 | Health | F0558 | Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident. | D | 2024-05-29 |
| 2024-05-17 | Health | F0677 | Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable. | D | 2024-05-29 |
| 2024-05-17 | Health | F0684 | Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals. | D | 2024-05-29 |
| 2024-05-17 | Health | F0689 | Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents. | E | 2024-05-29 |
| 2024-05-17 | Health | F0695 | Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed. | D | 2024-05-29 |
| 2024-05-17 | Health | F0812 | Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards. | F | 2024-05-29 |
| 2023-04-20 | Health | F0689 | Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents. | E | 2023-04-27 |
scope_severity uses the CMS letter grid: A is least serious, L most. J, K and L are immediate jeopardy. Rows are the surveyor's findings of record, not the model's opinion.
Licensure actions
0No licensure actions on record for this facility. Absence of a record here means the sources CII ingests contain none, not that none exists anywhere.
Ownership
44| Owner | Role | Pct | From | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| APERION CARE EXEC HOLDINGS LLC | ADP OF THE SNF | — | 2023-07-01 | current | pecos_ownership |
| APERION CARE INC | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | 2023-07-01 | current | pecos_ownership |
| APERION CONSULTING, LLC | ADP OF THE SNF | — | 2023-07-01 | current | pecos_ownership |
| BERKOWITZ, DAVID | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | 2025-03-25 | current | pecos_ownership |
| CHASE OFFICE LLC | Individual has financial interest in both related organization and provider | — | 2023-07-01 | current | hcris_a_8_1 |
| CHASE OFFICE LLC | Individual has financial interest in both related organization and provider | — | 2024-01-01 | current | hcris_a_8_1 |
| CURIS SERVICES LLC | ADP OF THE SNF | — | 2023-07-01 | current | pecos_ownership |
| DAVID A BERKOWITZ DELTA TRUST | ADP OF THE SNF | — | 2023-07-01 | current | pecos_ownership |
| FOX PROP LLC | Individual has financial interest in both related organization and provider | — | 2023-07-01 | current | hcris_a_8_1 |
| FOX PROP LLC | Individual has financial interest in both related organization and provider | — | 2024-01-01 | current | hcris_a_8_1 |
| FOX PROP, LLC | ADP OF THE SNF | — | 2025-03-25 | current | pecos_ownership |
| FRANKEL, FREDERICK | ADP OF THE SNF | — | 2023-07-01 | current | pecos_ownership |
| GEIGEL, KATHERINE | ADP OF THE SNF | — | 2023-07-01 | current | pecos_ownership |
| GOLDFARB, BRIAN | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | 2023-07-01 | current | pecos_ownership |
| JOSHUA HOFFMAN TRUST | ADP OF THE SNF | — | 2023-07-01 | current | pecos_ownership |
| LAGTAPON, ENRICO GREGARIO | ADP OF THE SNF | — | 2023-07-01 | current | pecos_ownership |
| LAGTAPON, ENRICO GREGARIO | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | 2025-07-08 | current | pecos_ownership |
| LAPTAPON, MARIA | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | — | 2023-07-01 | current | pecos_ownership |
| MEYSTEL, YOSEF | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | 2025-03-25 | current | pecos_ownership |
| SEITLER, DOVID | ADP OF THE SNF | — | 2023-07-01 | current | pecos_ownership |
| SHROFF, PRANAV KUMAR | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | 2023-07-01 | current | pecos_ownership |
| SPECTOR, JENNIFER | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | 2023-07-01 | current | pecos_ownership |
| TUROFSKY, STEVEN | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | 2023-07-01 | current | pecos_ownership |
| ULBERT, LISA | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | 2023-07-01 | current | pecos_ownership |
| WILHELM, NAFTALI | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | 2023-07-01 | current | pecos_ownership |
| YOSEF MEYSTEL DECLARATION OF TR OF YOSEF MEYSTEL TTEE | ADP OF THE SNF | — | 2023-07-01 | current | pecos_ownership |
| YOSEF MEYSTEL DELTA TRUST | ADP OF THE SNF | — | 2023-07-01 | current | pecos_ownership |
| JENNIFER SPECTOR | CORPORATE OFFICER | 100% | 2023-07-01 | ended 2026-05-18 | pecos_ownership |
| LISA ULBERT | CORPORATE OFFICER | 100% | 2023-07-01 | ended 2026-05-18 | pecos_ownership |
| JONATHAN DAUBER | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 49% | 2023-07-01 | ended 2026-05-18 | pecos_ownership |
| BRIAN GOLDFARB | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 1% | 2023-07-01 | ended 2026-05-18 | pecos_ownership |
| DOVID SEITLER | ADP OF THE SNF | — | 2023-07-01 | ended 2026-05-18 | pecos_ownership |
| ENRICO GREGARIO LAGTAPON | ADP OF THE SNF | — | 2023-07-01 | ended 2026-05-18 | pecos_ownership |
| FREDERICK FRANKEL | ADP OF THE SNF | — | 2023-07-01 | ended 2026-05-18 | pecos_ownership |
| H.M. REAL ESTATE LLC | Corporation, partnership or other organization has financial interest in provider | — | 2020-01-01 | ended 2020-12-31 | hcris_a_8_1 |
| H.M. REAL ESTATE LLC | Corporation, partnership or other organization has financial interest in provider | — | 2021-01-01 | ended 2021-12-31 | hcris_a_8_1 |
| H.M. REAL ESTATE LLC | Corporation, partnership or other organization has financial interest in provider | — | 2022-01-01 | ended 2022-12-31 | hcris_a_8_1 |
| H.M. REAL ESTATE LLC | Corporation, partnership or other organization has financial interest in provider | — | 2023-01-01 | ended 2023-06-30 | hcris_a_8_1 |
| JOSHUA HOFFMAN TR JOSHUA HOFFMAN TTEE | ADP OF THE SNF | — | 2023-07-01 | ended 2026-05-18 | pecos_ownership |
| KATHERINE GEIGEL | ADP OF THE SNF | — | 2023-07-01 | ended 2026-05-18 | pecos_ownership |
| MARIA LAPTAPON | ADP OF THE SNF | — | 2023-07-01 | ended 2026-05-18 | pecos_ownership |
| NAFTALI WILHELM | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | 2023-07-01 | ended 2026-05-18 | pecos_ownership |
| PRANAV KUMAR SHROFF | ADP OF THE SNF | — | 2023-07-01 | ended 2026-05-18 | pecos_ownership |
| STEVEN TUROFSKY | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | 2023-07-01 | ended 2026-05-18 | pecos_ownership |
PECOS ownership and managing-control associations. Current edges have no end date in the source; historical edges are retained.
Transactions
1| Close date | Price | Buyer | Seller | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-01 | — | APERION CARE FOX RIVER LLC | HERITAGE MANOR ELGIN LLC | chow |
Comparable trades — IL snf
12| Close | Facility | Price | $/bed | Cap rate | Beds | Buyer |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-05-01 | RIVAYA CARE OF DES PLAINES | — | — | — | 231 | RIVAYA CARE OF DES PLAINES LLC |
| 2025-04-10 | THE PEARL OF DOWNERS GROVE | — | — | — | 145 | PEARL OF DOWNERS GROVE LLC |
| 2025-04-01 | La Bella of Mascoutah | — | — | — | 76 | MASCOUTAH REHAB AND NURSING LLC |
| 2025-04-01 | MONMOUTH REHAB AND NURSING | — | — | — | 58 | MONMOUTH REHAB AND NURSING LLC |
| 2025-03-05 | GOLDWATER CARE CLINTON | — | — | — | 134 | GOLDWATER CARE CLINTON LLC |
| 2025-03-01 | THE HAVEN OF BRIDGEPORT | — | — | — | 99 | HAVEN OF BRIDGEPORT LLC |
| 2025-03-01 | CASS COUNTY SENIOR LIVING & REHABILITATION LLC | — | — | — | 71 | CASS COUNTY SENIOR LIVING & REHABILITATION LLC |
| 2025-03-01 | Avantara Joliet | — | — | — | 154 | PRIME HEALTHCARE SENIOR LIVING, LLC |
| 2025-03-01 | THE HAVEN OF ST. ELMO | — | — | — | 60 | HAVEN OF ST. ELMO LLC |
| 2025-02-01 | Arc at Sangamon Valley | — | — | — | 171 | ARC AT SANGAMON VALLEY LLC |
| 2025-02-01 | ARC AT HICKORY POINT | — | — | — | 64 | ARC AT HICKORY POINT LLC |
| 2024-12-17 | WYNSCAPE HEALTH & REHAB | — | — | — | 209 | NELP-WYNDEMERE OPERATOR LLC |
Most recent same-state, same-setting trades. Most CHOW-derived trades carry no disclosed consideration, so price, $/bed, and cap rate show only where a sale price was resolved from a deed or filing — blanks are honest, not missing data.
Market rent context
35| Geo | Kind | BR | Amount | As of | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| county 17089 | acs median gross | 0 | $1,090 | 2024-12-31 | CENSUS_ACS5 |
| county 17089 | fmr | 0 | $1,480 | 2025-10-01 | HUD_USER_FMR |
| county 17089 | acs median gross | 1 | $1,175 | 2024-12-31 | CENSUS_ACS5 |
| county 17089 | fmr | 1 | $1,581 | 2025-10-01 | HUD_USER_FMR |
| county 17089 | acs median gross | 2 | $1,451 | 2024-12-31 | CENSUS_ACS5 |
| county 17089 | fmr | 2 | $1,781 | 2025-10-01 | HUD_USER_FMR |
| county 17089 | acs median gross | 3 | $1,771 | 2024-12-31 | CENSUS_ACS5 |
| county 17089 | fmr | 3 | $2,294 | 2025-10-01 | HUD_USER_FMR |
| county 17089 | acs median gross | 4 | $1,883 | 2024-12-31 | CENSUS_ACS5 |
| county 17089 | fmr | 4 | $2,653 | 2025-10-01 | HUD_USER_FMR |
| county 17089 | acs median gross | 5 | $1,770 | 2024-12-31 | CENSUS_ACS5 |
| county 17089 | acs median gross | $1,453 | 2024-12-31 | CENSUS_ACS5 | |
| county 17089 | acs recent mover gross | $1,632 | 2024-12-31 | CENSUS_ACS5 | |
| zcta 60120 | acs median gross | 0 | $886 | 2024-12-31 | CENSUS_ACS5 |
| zcta 60120 | acs median gross | 1 | $1,090 | 2024-12-31 | CENSUS_ACS5 |
| zcta 60120 | acs median gross | 2 | $1,417 | 2024-12-31 | CENSUS_ACS5 |
| zcta 60120 | acs median gross | 3 | $1,706 | 2024-12-31 | CENSUS_ACS5 |
| zcta 60120 | acs median gross | 4 | $1,727 | 2024-12-31 | CENSUS_ACS5 |
| zcta 60120 | acs median gross | $1,371 | 2024-12-31 | CENSUS_ACS5 | |
| zcta 60120 | acs recent mover gross | $1,773 | 2024-12-31 | CENSUS_ACS5 | |
| zip 60120 | payment standard 110 | 0 | $1,496 | 2025-10-01 | HUD_USER_SAFMR |
| zip 60120 | payment standard 90 | 0 | $1,224 | 2025-10-01 | HUD_USER_SAFMR |
| zip 60120 | safmr | 0 | $1,360 | 2025-10-01 | HUD_USER_SAFMR |
| zip 60120 | payment standard 110 | 1 | $1,606 | 2025-10-01 | HUD_USER_SAFMR |
| zip 60120 | payment standard 90 | 1 | $1,314 | 2025-10-01 | HUD_USER_SAFMR |
| zip 60120 | safmr | 1 | $1,460 | 2025-10-01 | HUD_USER_SAFMR |
| zip 60120 | payment standard 110 | 2 | $1,804 | 2025-10-01 | HUD_USER_SAFMR |
| zip 60120 | payment standard 90 | 2 | $1,476 | 2025-10-01 | HUD_USER_SAFMR |
| zip 60120 | safmr | 2 | $1,640 | 2025-10-01 | HUD_USER_SAFMR |
| zip 60120 | payment standard 110 | 3 | $2,321 | 2025-10-01 | HUD_USER_SAFMR |
| zip 60120 | payment standard 90 | 3 | $1,899 | 2025-10-01 | HUD_USER_SAFMR |
| zip 60120 | safmr | 3 | $2,110 | 2025-10-01 | HUD_USER_SAFMR |
| zip 60120 | payment standard 110 | 4 | $2,684 | 2025-10-01 | HUD_USER_SAFMR |
| zip 60120 | payment standard 90 | 4 | $2,196 | 2025-10-01 | HUD_USER_SAFMR |
| zip 60120 | safmr | 4 | $2,440 | 2025-10-01 | HUD_USER_SAFMR |
ACS median gross rents and HUD FMR/SAFMR for the facility's county and ZIP. Context for underwriting, not facility pricing.