Owners / WALDEN, YEHUDAH
WALDEN, YEHUDAH
Facilities
12
across 3 states
Chains touched
1
operating names in fleet
Certified beds
1,530
Fleet mean score
39.6
composite percentile
D/F facilities
2
Open ML connections
0
Fleet
12| Facility | St | Setting | Chain | Beds | Stake | Role | Score | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UTICA REHABILITATION & NURSING CENTER | NY | snf | — | 120 | 15% | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 94.6 | D |
| Holmes Lake Rehabilitation & Care Center | NE | snf | — | 97 | — | TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | 89.0 | D |
| REHABILITATION & NURSING CENTER AT EVERETT (THE) | MA | snf | — | 183 | — | CORPORATE OFFICER | 57.6 | B |
| CAMBRIDGE REHABILITATION & NURSING CENTER | MA | snf | ARB II HOLDINGS LLC | 83 | — | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | 50.6 | B |
| Medford Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | MA | snf | ARB II HOLDINGS LLC | 142 | — | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | 39.9 | B |
| Sodus Rehabilitation & Nursing Center | NY | snf | — | 130 | 15% | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 26.2 | A |
| YORKTOWN REHABILITATION & NURSING CENTER | NY | snf | — | 200 | 15% | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 25.3 | A |
| DELHI REHABILITATION AND NURSING CENTER | NY | snf | — | 176 | 23% | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 23.6 | A |
| AUBURN REHABILITATION & NURSING CENTER | NY | snf | — | 92 | 15% | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 22.5 | A |
| GHENT REHABILITATION & NURSING CENTER | NY | snf | — | 120 | 15% | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 17.0 | A |
| PLATTSBURGH REHABILITATION AND NURSING CENTER | NY | snf | — | 89 | 15% | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 14.9 | A |
| HIGHLAND REHABILITATION AND NURSING CENTER | NY | snf | — | 98 | 20% | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 13.7 | A |
role and stake are per CMS ownership disclosure; score is the deterministic composite percentile
Deal history
0No CHOW events match this owner's disclosed organization name as buyer or seller.
exact organization-name matches against the CMS CHOW tape — deterministic, no fuzzy merging
Deal history is exact case-insensitive organization-name matches against the CMS CHOW tape - deterministic, no fuzzy merging. ML signals come from the parallel engine.