Owners / SAM KASSAB
SAM KASSAB
Facilities
24
across 5 states
Chains touched
2
operating names in fleet
Certified beds
—
Fleet mean score
63.9
composite percentile
D/F facilities
6
Open ML connections
0
Fleet
24| Facility | St | Setting | Chain | Beds | Stake | Role | Score | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GUARDIAN ANGEL HOME CARE OF COLUMBUS | OH | home health | — | — | — | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | 94.4 | D |
| GUARDIAN ANGEL HOME CARE AND HOSPICE OF AKRON | OH | home health | GUARDIAN ANGEL HOME CARE INC | — | — | CORPORATE OFFICER | 93.1 | D |
| GUARDIAN ANGEL HOME CARE & HOSPICE OF ROCHESTER HI | MI | hospice | GUARDIAN ANGEL HOME CARE INC | — | 100% | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 92.1 | D |
| GUARDIAN ANGEL HOME CARE OF LAS VEGAS LLC | NV | home health | GUARDIAN ANGEL HOME CARE INC | — | 100% | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 91.7 | D |
| GUARDIAN ANGEL HOME CARE OF PARK RIDGE, INC | IL | home health | GUARDIAN ANGEL HOME CARE INC | — | 100% | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 87.0 | D |
| GUARDIAN ANGEL HOME CARE OF SANTA ROSA, LLC | CA | home health | GUARDIAN ANGEL HOME CARE INC | — | 100% | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 85.9 | D |
| DANNY'S HOME HEALH CARE INC | CA | home health | DANNY'S HOME HEALTH CARE, INC. | — | — | CORPORATE OFFICER | 81.8 | C |
| GUARDIAN ANGEL HOME CARE AND HOSPICE OF ROCHESTER HILLS | MI | home health | GUARDIAN ANGEL HOME CARE INC | — | 100% | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 77.5 | C |
| GUARDIAN ANGEL HOME CARE OF MORAINE | OH | home health | GUARDIAN ANGEL HOME CARE INC | — | 100% | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 76.4 | C |
| GUARDIAN ANGEL HOME CARE, INC | CA | home health | GUARDIAN ANGEL HOME CARE INC | — | 100% | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 75.2 | C |
| DANNY'S HOME HEALTH CARE, INC | CA | home health | DANNY'S HOME HEALTH CARE, INC. | — | — | CORPORATE OFFICER | 65.1 | C |
| GUARDIAN ANGEL HOME CARE OF SYLVANIA | OH | home health | GUARDIAN ANGEL HOME CARE INC | — | 100% | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 62.4 | C |
| GUARDIAN ANGEL HOME CARE OF FRESNO LLC | CA | home health | GUARDIAN ANGEL HOME CARE INC | — | 100% | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 61.3 | C |
| GUARDIAN ANGEL HOME CARE OF SAN DIEGO LLC | CA | home health | GUARDIAN ANGEL HOME CARE INC | — | 100% | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 59.5 | B |
| DANNY'S HOME HEALTH CARE | MI | home health | — | — | 0% | CORPORATE OFFICER | 59.4 | B |
| GUARDIAN ANGEL HOME CARE OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, LLC | CA | home health | GUARDIAN ANGEL HOME CARE INC | — | 100% | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 59.0 | B |
| GUARDIAN ANGEL HOME CARE, INC | CA | home health | GUARDIAN ANGEL HOME CARE INC | — | 100% | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 50.5 | B |
| GUARDIAN ANGEL HOME CARE AND HOSPICE OF ONTARIO LLC | CA | home health | GUARDIAN ANGEL HOME CARE INC | — | 100% | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 45.4 | B |
| DANNY'S HOME HEALTH CARE INC | CA | home health | DANNY'S HOME HEALTH CARE, INC. | — | 0% | CORPORATE OFFICER | 45.3 | B |
| GUARDIAN ANGEL HOME CARE OF GRAND RAPIDS | MI | home health | GUARDIAN ANGEL HOME CARE INC | — | 100% | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 44.8 | B |
| GUARDIAN ANGEL HOME CARE OF SAN JOSE LLC | CA | home health | GUARDIAN ANGEL HOME CARE INC | — | 100% | CORPORATE OFFICER | 35.2 | B |
| GUARDIAN ANGEL HOME CARE OF VENTURA, LLC | CA | home health | GUARDIAN ANGEL HOME CARE INC | — | 100% | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 33.6 | B |
| GUARDIAN ANGEL HOME CARE OF BAKERSFIELD, LLC | CA | home health | GUARDIAN ANGEL HOME CARE INC | — | 100% | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 30.5 | B |
| GUARDIAN ANGEL HOME CARE OF SANTA ANA, LLC | CA | home health | GUARDIAN ANGEL HOME CARE INC | — | 100% | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 25.3 | A |
role and stake are per CMS ownership disclosure; score is the deterministic composite percentile
Deal history
0No CHOW events match this owner's disclosed organization name as buyer or seller.
exact organization-name matches against the CMS CHOW tape — deterministic, no fuzzy merging
Deal history is exact case-insensitive organization-name matches against the CMS CHOW tape - deterministic, no fuzzy merging. ML signals come from the parallel engine.