Owners / JAMIN RUARK
JAMIN RUARK
Facilities
10
across 3 states
Chains touched
1
operating names in fleet
Certified beds
—
Fleet mean score
63.9
composite percentile
D/F facilities
2
Open ML connections
0
Fleet
10| Facility | St | Setting | Chain | Beds | Stake | Role | Score | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HAVEN HOSPICE | AZ | hospice | — | — | 100% | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 96.3 | F |
| HAVEN HOSPICE | AZ | hospice | CHARIS HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS LLC | — | 50% | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | 86.0 | D |
| HAVEN HOME HEALTH CARE | FL | home health | CHARIS HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS LLC | — | 23% | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 76.3 | C |
| HAVEN HOME HEALTH CARE | AZ | home health | CHARIS HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS LLC | — | 100% | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 72.2 | C |
| HAVEN HOME HEALTH CARE | WA | home health | CHARIS HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS LLC | — | 23% | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 70.6 | C |
| HAVEN HOME HEALTH CARE | FL | home health | CHARIS HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS LLC | — | 23% | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 66.1 | C |
| HAVEN HOME HEALTH CARE | FL | home health | CHARIS HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS LLC | — | 23% | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 62.4 | C |
| HAVEN HOME HEALTH CARE | AZ | home health | — | — | 100% | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | 45.9 | B |
| HAVEN HOME HEALTH CARE | FL | home health | CHARIS HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS LLC | — | 100% | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | 38.8 | B |
| HOME HEALTH SAFFORD, LLC | AZ | home health | CHARIS HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS LLC | — | 23% | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 24.3 | A |
role and stake are per CMS ownership disclosure; score is the deterministic composite percentile
Deal history
0No CHOW events match this owner's disclosed organization name as buyer or seller.
exact organization-name matches against the CMS CHOW tape — deterministic, no fuzzy merging
Deal history is exact case-insensitive organization-name matches against the CMS CHOW tape - deterministic, no fuzzy merging. ML signals come from the parallel engine.