Owners / JAMES SPRIGGS
JAMES SPRIGGS
Facilities
23
across 1 state
Chains touched
1
operating names in fleet
Certified beds
—
Fleet mean score
39.3
composite percentile
D/F facilities
0
Open ML connections
0
Fleet
23| Facility | St | Setting | Chain | Beds | Stake | Role | Score | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CONCIERGE HOME CARE | FL | home health | NEW YORK STATE TEACHERS RETIREMENT SYSTEM | — | 7% | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 72.8 | C |
| CONCIERGE HOME CARE | FL | home health | NEW YORK STATE TEACHERS RETIREMENT SYSTEM | — | 7% | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 61.3 | C |
| CONCIERGE HOME CARE | FL | home health | NEW YORK STATE TEACHERS RETIREMENT SYSTEM | — | 7% | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 58.8 | B |
| CONCIERGE HOME CARE | FL | home health | NEW YORK STATE TEACHERS RETIREMENT SYSTEM | — | 7% | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 47.2 | B |
| CONCIERGE HOME CARE | FL | home health | NEW YORK STATE TEACHERS RETIREMENT SYSTEM | — | 7% | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 45.5 | B |
| CONCIERGE HOME CARE | FL | home health | NEW YORK STATE TEACHERS RETIREMENT SYSTEM | — | 7% | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 45.5 | B |
| CONCIERGE HOME CARE | FL | home health | NEW YORK STATE TEACHERS RETIREMENT SYSTEM | — | 7% | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 42.4 | B |
| CONCIERGE HOME CARE | FL | home health | NEW YORK STATE TEACHERS RETIREMENT SYSTEM | — | 7% | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 41.7 | B |
| CONCIERGE HOME CARE | FL | home health | NEW YORK STATE TEACHERS RETIREMENT SYSTEM | — | 7% | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 41.5 | B |
| CONCIERGE HOME CARE | FL | home health | NEW YORK STATE TEACHERS RETIREMENT SYSTEM | — | 7% | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 41.5 | B |
| CONCIERGE HOME CARE | FL | home health | NEW YORK STATE TEACHERS RETIREMENT SYSTEM | — | 7% | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 35.3 | B |
| CONCIERGE HOME CARE | FL | home health | NEW YORK STATE TEACHERS RETIREMENT SYSTEM | — | 7% | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 34.8 | B |
| CONCIERGE HOME CARE | FL | home health | NEW YORK STATE TEACHERS RETIREMENT SYSTEM | — | 7% | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 34.5 | B |
| CONCIERGE HOME CARE | FL | home health | NEW YORK STATE TEACHERS RETIREMENT SYSTEM | — | 7% | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 34.3 | B |
| CONCIERGE HOME CARE | FL | home health | NEW YORK STATE TEACHERS RETIREMENT SYSTEM | — | 7% | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 32.7 | B |
| CONCIERGE HOME CARE | FL | home health | NEW YORK STATE TEACHERS RETIREMENT SYSTEM | — | 7% | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 32.5 | B |
| CONCIERGE HOME CARE | FL | home health | NEW YORK STATE TEACHERS RETIREMENT SYSTEM | — | 7% | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 32.2 | B |
| CONCIERGE HOME CARE | FL | home health | NEW YORK STATE TEACHERS RETIREMENT SYSTEM | — | 7% | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 29.6 | A |
| CONCIERGE HOME CARE | FL | home health | NEW YORK STATE TEACHERS RETIREMENT SYSTEM | — | 7% | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 29.4 | A |
| CONCIERGE HOME CARE | FL | home health | NEW YORK STATE TEACHERS RETIREMENT SYSTEM | — | 7% | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 29.2 | A |
| CONCIERGE HOME CARE | FL | home health | NEW YORK STATE TEACHERS RETIREMENT SYSTEM | — | 7% | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 28.3 | A |
| CONCIERGE HOME CARE | FL | home health | NEW YORK STATE TEACHERS RETIREMENT SYSTEM | — | 7% | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 27.6 | A |
| CONCIERGE HOME CARE | FL | home health | NEW YORK STATE TEACHERS RETIREMENT SYSTEM | — | 7% | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 24.2 | A |
role and stake are per CMS ownership disclosure; score is the deterministic composite percentile
Deal history
0No CHOW events match this owner's disclosed organization name as buyer or seller.
exact organization-name matches against the CMS CHOW tape — deterministic, no fuzzy merging
Deal history is exact case-insensitive organization-name matches against the CMS CHOW tape - deterministic, no fuzzy merging. ML signals come from the parallel engine.