Operating-name rollups
Chain Rollup
grade mix per operator — percentile means across peer groups are a blunt signal, the mix is the comparable statisticChains matching
2,858
with ≥ 2 facilities
| Chain | Facilities ↓ | Grade mix | % D/F | Mean pctl | States | Settings | Beds | Low evid. |
|---|
| NORTON BROS HOLDING COMPANY | 2 |
| 0.0% | 6.8 | 1 | snf | 197 | 0 |
| Novel Home Health Care Services Of New York, Corp. | 2 |
| 0.0% | 0.0 | 1 | home health | — | 0 |
| NUCLEAR CARE PARTNERS LLC | 2 |
| 100.0% | 98.7 | 1 | home health | — | 0 |
| NVJ OPERATIONS LLC | 2 |
| 0.0% | 37.6 | 1 | alf | — | 0 |
| NVNA FOUNDATION INC | 2 |
| 0.0% | 34.2 | 1 | home health,hospice | — | 0 |
| Ny Home Care Select, Llc | 2 |
| 0.0% | 0.0 | 1 | home health | — | 0 |
| Nyc Home Health Care, Llc | 2 |
| 50.0% | 69.3 | 1 | home health | — | 1 |
| OAK MANOR, INC | 2 |
| 0.0% | 52.8 | 2 | alf,snf | 0 | 0 |
| OAKWOOD LUTHERAN SENIOR MINISTRIES INC | 2 |
| 0.0% | 71.3 | 1 | snf | 110 | 0 |
| Oceanview Manor Home for Adults, Inc. | 2 |
| 0.0% | 33.5 | 1 | alf,home health | — | 1 |
| OCHILTREE HOSPITAL DISTRICT | 2 |
| 0.0% | 27.5 | 1 | home health,hospice | — | 0 |
| OHIO S HOSPICE INC | 2 |
| 0.0% | 31.4 | 1 | hospice | — | 0 |
| OHIOANS HOME HEALTHCARE INC | 2 |
| 0.0% | 44.1 | 2 | home health | — | 0 |
| OKLAHOMA ACQUISITIONS LLC | 2 |
| 0.0% | 62.6 | 1 | snf | 265 | 0 |
| Olean Manor, Inc. | 2 |
| 50.0% | 77.9 | 1 | alf,home health | — | 1 |
| OMNIA CUM DEO CORP. | 2 |
| 0.0% | 34.8 | 1 | alf | — | 0 |
| ON WITH LIFE INC | 2 |
| 0.0% | 23.9 | 1 | snf | 68 | 0 |
| ONCARE HEALTH LLC | 2 |
| 0.0% | 35.4 | 1 | home health,hospice | — | 0 |
| ONE BROOKLYN HEALTH SYSTEM INC | 2 |
| 50.0% | 79.8 | 1 | snf | 986 | 0 |
| ONE LEGACY HOME HEALTH CARE, INC. | 2 |
| 0.0% | 60.2 | 1 | home health | — | 1 |
| OPTIMAE LIFESERVICES INC | 2 |
| 50.0% | 85.6 | 1 | home health | — | 0 |
| OPTIMAL HOLDINGS LLC | 2 |
| 0.0% | 59.2 | 1 | home health | — | 0 |
| OPTION CARE ENTERPRISES, INC. | 2 |
| 0.0% | 36.2 | 1 | home health | — | 0 |
| OPTUM INFUSION SERVICES 203 INC | 2 |
| 100.0% | 97.4 | 1 | home health | — | 0 |
| Optum Of New York, Inc. | 2 |
| 0.0% | 0.0 | 1 | home health | — | 2 |
| OPTUM WOMENS AND CHILDRENS HEALTH LLC | 2 |
| 100.0% | 98.2 | 1 | home health | — | 0 |
| ORESBURN & ASSOCIATES INC. | 2 |
| 0.0% | 56.2 | 1 | alf | — | 0 |
| ORLANDO LUTHERAN TOWERS, INC. | 2 |
| 50.0% | 72.2 | 1 | adult day,alf | — | 0 |
| OSWEGO HEALTH INC | 2 |
| 0.0% | 32.9 | 1 | home health,snf | 120 | 0 |
| Our Lady of Lourdes Memorial Hospital Inc | 2 | — | — | — | 1 | home health,hospice | — | 0 |
| OXMATI MANAGEMENT LLC | 2 |
| 0.0% | 66.7 | 1 | snf | 155 | 0 |
| PA OPS HOLDINGS LLC | 2 |
| 0.0% | 62.6 | 1 | snf | 360 | 0 |
| PACIFIC HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS INC | 2 |
| 0.0% | 62.5 | 1 | snf | 293 | 0 |
| PACIFIC POINT HEALTH CARE SERVICES, INC. | 2 |
| 0.0% | 54.7 | 1 | home health,hospice | — | 0 |
| PACS GROUP INC | 2 |
| 0.0% | 74.5 | 2 | snf | 211 | 0 |
| PAKHDAVOR LLC | 2 |
| 0.0% | 24.1 | 1 | snf | 180 | 0 |
| PALM BEACH COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS | 2 |
| 0.0% | 48.3 | 1 | adult day | — | 0 |
| PALO ALTO COUNTY HOSPITAL | 2 |
| 0.0% | 23.9 | 1 | home health,hospice | — | 0 |
| PARAMOUNT ALF, INC | 2 |
| 100.0% | 94.4 | 1 | alf | — | 0 |
| Paramount Security Bureau, Inc. | 2 |
| 50.0% | 49.8 | 1 | home health | — | 1 |
| Parent Care Home Care, Llc | 2 |
| 50.0% | 70.8 | 1 | home health | — | 0 |
| PARK NICOLLET HEALTH SERVICES | 2 |
| 0.0% | 40.3 | 1 | home health,hospice | — | 0 |
| PARKLYNN HOLDINGS LLC | 2 |
| 50.0% | 67.7 | 1 | home health | — | 0 |
| Parkshore Home Health Care Llc | 2 |
| 0.0% | 30.2 | 1 | home health | — | 0 |
| Parkview Hfa, Inc. | 2 |
| 0.0% | 73.0 | 1 | alf,home health | — | 0 |
| PATE & INGRAM HOMES | 2 |
| 0.0% | 75.4 | 1 | icf iid | 12 | 0 |
| Paul F. Wolfe | 2 |
| 0.0% | 22.2 | 1 | alf,home health | — | 1 |
| PEACE CAPITAL LLC | 2 |
| 50.0% | 72.3 | 1 | snf | 350 | 0 |
| PEACE CARE INC | 2 |
| 0.0% | 44.3 | 1 | snf | 259 | 0 |
| PECOS COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL DISTRICT | 2 |
| 0.0% | 24.4 | 1 | home health,hospice | — | 0 |
Grades are peer-group percentiles, so the grade mix is the comparable statistic. mean_percentile_position averages percentile positions across peer groups and should be read as a rough central tendency, not a score.