Operating-name rollups
Chain Rollup
Chains matching
2,858
with ≥ 2 facilities
| Chain | Facilities ↑ | Grade mix | % D/F | Mean pctl | States | Settings | Beds | Low evid. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PEPPERMINT RIDGE | 8 | 0.0% | 38.3 | 1 | icf iid | 72 | 0 | |
| PREFERRED MANAGEMENT CORPORATION | 8 | 0.0% | 66.4 | 2 | home health,hospice | — | 0 | |
| PROVIDENCE GROUP INC | 8 | 0.0% | 43.4 | 2 | snf | 888 | 0 | |
| RELIANT PRO REHAB LLC | 8 | 12.5% | 53.6 | 6 | snf | 848 | 0 | |
| SALEM CHRISTIAN HOMES, INC. | 8 | 12.5% | 33.6 | 1 | icf iid | 48 | 0 | |
| SELECT REHABILITATION LLC | 8 | 25.0% | 47.6 | 4 | snf | 1,080 | 0 | |
| SELECTIS HEALTH INC | 8 | 25.0% | 66.6 | 2 | snf | 709 | 0 | |
| SHELLIE K GREINER REVOCABLE TRUST | 8 | 25.0% | 59.9 | 3 | hospice | — | 0 | |
| SOUTHERN HOME CARE SERVICES INC | 8 | 62.5% | 66.8 | 1 | home health | — | 0 | |
| SPRINGPOINT SENIOR LIVING INC | 8 | 0.0% | 25.7 | 2 | snf | 491 | 0 | |
| SUPERIOR HEALTH HOLDINGS INC | 8 | 0.0% | 60.1 | 1 | home health,hospice | — | 0 | |
| TMS CJ HOLDINGS LLC | 8 | 37.5% | 67.3 | 7 | home health | — | 0 | |
| TRILOGY SENIOR LIVING MANAGEMENT, LLC | 8 | 12.5% | 57.0 | 1 | alf | — | 3 | |
| UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS HOSPITAL AUTHORITY | 8 | 37.5% | 65.4 | 2 | home health,hospice | — | 0 | |
| UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA HEALTH CARE SYSTEM | 8 | 0.0% | 20.9 | 1 | home health,hospice,snf | 348 | 0 | |
| WEST HARBOR HEALTHCARE LLC | 8 | 0.0% | 33.1 | 1 | snf | 780 | 0 | |
| WINDSOR HOUSE INC | 8 | 0.0% | 43.6 | 1 | snf | 743 | 0 | |
| WOODLAWN HOSPITAL | 8 | 12.5% | 52.8 | 1 | snf | 775 | 0 | |
| ACSK HOME CARE INC | 9 | 55.6% | 82.8 | 5 | home health,hospice | — | 0 | |
| ACSK HOSPICE INC | 9 | 22.2% | 70.3 | 5 | home health,hospice | — | 0 | |
| ALLIANCE HEALTH INC | 9 | 0.0% | 30.2 | 1 | hospice,snf | 902 | 0 | |
| ALZHEIMER'S COMMUNITY CARE, INC. | 9 | 0.0% | 57.5 | 1 | adult day | — | 0 | |
| AOM HEALTHCARE LLC | 9 | 0.0% | 37.2 | 1 | snf | 666 | 0 | |
| ASCENSION HEALTH | 9 | 11.1% | 53.5 | 4 | home health,hospice,snf | 46 | 0 | |
| BALL VENTURES LLC | 9 | 33.3% | 73.4 | 3 | home health,hospice,snf | 144 | 0 | |
| BALLAD HEALTH | 9 | 0.0% | 36.3 | 2 | home health,hospice,snf | 417 | 0 | |
| BAYSHIRE LLC | 9 | 0.0% | 44.3 | 1 | snf | 678 | 0 | |
| BEAVER CITY CORPORATION | 9 | 33.3% | 61.5 | 1 | home health,hospice,snf | 717 | 0 | |
| Bestcare, Inc. | 9 | 0.0% | 0.0 | 1 | home health | — | 0 | |
| BLUEGRASS CONSULTING GROUP LLC | 9 | 0.0% | 33.8 | 1 | snf | 776 | 0 | |
| BON SECOURS MERCY HEALTH INC | 9 | 0.0% | 38.7 | 4 | home health,hospice,snf | 295 | 0 | |
| CARELINE HOLDCO LLC | 9 | 11.1% | 59.9 | 3 | home health,hospice | — | 0 | |
| CARING PROFESSIONALS INC | 9 | 11.1% | 43.5 | 2 | home health,snf | 205 | 0 | |
| CHARIS HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS LLC | 9 | 11.1% | 62.3 | 3 | home health,hospice | — | 0 | |
| DECATUR HOSPITAL AUTHORITY | 9 | 44.4% | 77.6 | 1 | snf | 0 | 0 | |
| DePaul Adult Care Communities, Inc. | 9 | 11.1% | 59.5 | 1 | alf,home health | — | 0 | |
| ESNH LLC | 9 | 11.1% | 36.2 | 2 | snf | 1,188 | 0 | |
| FRONT PORCH COMMUNITIES AND SERVICES | 9 | 0.0% | 13.7 | 1 | snf | 503 | 0 | |
| FRONTIER MANAGEMENT INC | 9 | 0.0% | 39.3 | 2 | snf | 603 | 0 | |
| GEL PARTNERSHIP,INC | 9 | 0.0% | 32.8 | 1 | alf | — | 0 | |
| HARBOR HEALTH CARE, INC. | 9 | 11.1% | 82.2 | 1 | icf iid | 54 | 0 | |
| IHCS CMS PARENT LLC | 9 | 22.2% | 58.5 | 2 | home health | — | 0 | |
| JAG HEALTHCARE INC | 9 | 11.1% | 24.3 | 1 | snf | 518 | 0 | |
| KAI HOLDINGS LLC | 9 | 22.2% | 68.4 | 4 | hospice | — | 0 | |
| KULANU OC TRUST | 9 | 55.6% | 74.6 | 1 | snf | 1,056 | 0 | |
| LAS MERCEDES ADULT DAY CARE V, LLC | 9 | 11.1% | 67.4 | 1 | adult day | — | 0 | |
| LHC GROUP INC | 9 | 11.1% | 59.9 | 4 | home health | — | 0 | |
| LIVEWELL TOPCO INC | 9 | 0.0% | 63.8 | 4 | home health,hospice | — | 0 | |
| LONG FAMILY VENTURES LLC | 9 | 0.0% | 41.9 | 2 | home health,hospice | — | 0 | |
| LSA MANAGEMENT INC | 9 | 0.0% | 29.2 | 1 | snf | 904 | 0 |
Grades are peer-group percentiles, so the grade mix is the comparable statistic. mean_percentile_position averages percentile positions across peer groups and should be read as a rough central tendency, not a score.