Operating-name rollups
Chain Rollup
grade mix per operator — percentile means across peer groups are a blunt signal, the mix is the comparable statisticChains matching
2,858
with ≥ 2 facilities
| Chain | Facilities ↑ | Grade mix | % D/F | Mean pctl | States | Settings | Beds | Low evid. |
|---|
| ANDREWS COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT | 2 |
| 0.0% | 38.1 | 1 | home health,snf | 0 | 0 |
| ANDROSCOGGIN HOME HEALTH SERVICES INC | 2 |
| 0.0% | 28.2 | 1 | home health,hospice | — | 0 |
| Angel Care, Inc. | 2 |
| 0.0% | 0.0 | 1 | home health | — | 0 |
| ANGEL PLACE ASSISTED LIVING HOMES INC | 2 |
| 0.0% | 65.0 | 1 | alf | — | 0 |
| ANGEL TOUCH HOME CARE LLC | 2 |
| 0.0% | 24.3 | 1 | home health | — | 0 |
| ANGELCARE HOMES, LLC | 2 |
| 0.0% | 60.9 | 1 | alf | — | 0 |
| ANGELS OF VALLEY HOSPICE CARE, INC. | 2 |
| 50.0% | 87.5 | 1 | hospice | — | 0 |
| APEX HOME HEALTH CARE LLC | 2 |
| 0.0% | 43.4 | 1 | home health | — | 0 |
| APLE MANAGEMENT INC | 2 |
| 50.0% | 87.0 | 1 | home health | — | 0 |
| ARAA HOME CARE, LLC | 2 |
| 0.0% | 31.2 | 1 | home health | — | 0 |
| ARB II HOLDINGS LLC | 2 |
| 0.0% | 45.3 | 1 | snf | 225 | 0 |
| ARC PEARLAND, LP | 2 |
| 0.0% | 14.4 | 1 | alf | — | 0 |
| ARCP HEALTH LP | 2 |
| 0.0% | 65.7 | 2 | hospice,snf | 65 | 0 |
| AREA AGENCY ON AGING OF SOUTHEAST ARKANSAS INC | 2 |
| 0.0% | 23.7 | 1 | home health | — | 0 |
| ARGO HOME HEALTH INC | 2 |
| 0.0% | 37.4 | 1 | home health | — | 0 |
| ARM HEALTHCARE L L C | 2 |
| 50.0% | 85.0 | 1 | home health,hospice | — | 0 |
| ARTAU HOLDINGS III LLC | 2 |
| 0.0% | 78.7 | 1 | home health | — | 0 |
| ASBR HOLDINGS LLC | 2 |
| 100.0% | 93.6 | 1 | snf | 213 | 0 |
| ASCEND HEALTH LLC | 2 |
| 0.0% | 40.5 | 1 | home health,hospice | — | 0 |
| ASSISTED HOME CARE, INC. | 2 |
| 0.0% | 48.3 | 1 | hospice | — | 0 |
| Assisted Living At Northern Riverview, Inc. | 2 |
| 0.0% | 34.1 | 1 | alf,home health | — | 1 |
| ASSISTED LIVING MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC. | 2 |
| 0.0% | 28.9 | 1 | alf | — | 0 |
| ASSISTIVE HEALTH SYSTEMS INC. | 2 |
| 100.0% | 90.5 | 1 | home health,hospice | — | 0 |
| ASSOCIATION HOME CARE INC | 2 |
| 0.0% | 30.0 | 1 | home health | — | 0 |
| ASTON HEALTHCARE LLC | 2 |
| 0.0% | 53.7 | 1 | snf | 150 | 0 |
| Astra Home Care, Inc. | 2 |
| 50.0% | 50.0 | 1 | home health | — | 1 |
| At Home Care Partners, Incorporated | 2 |
| 0.0% | 0.0 | 1 | home health | — | 2 |
| Ateret Of Midwood Llc | 2 |
| 0.0% | 3.1 | 1 | alf,home health | — | 2 |
| ATHEN MANAGEMENT LLC | 2 |
| 0.0% | 44.2 | 1 | home health,hospice | — | 0 |
| ATLANTIC ALLCARE INC | 2 |
| 0.0% | 27.0 | 1 | home health | — | 0 |
| ATLANTIC HEALTH SYSTEM | 2 |
| 0.0% | 34.2 | 1 | snf | 183 | 0 |
| ATTAIE HEALTHCARE, INC. | 2 |
| 0.0% | 45.8 | 1 | home health,hospice | — | 0 |
| Attending Home Care Services, Llc | 2 |
| 50.0% | 69.3 | 1 | home health | — | 1 |
| Attentive Care, Inc. | 2 |
| 0.0% | 0.0 | 1 | home health | — | 0 |
| AU HOMES INC. | 2 |
| 0.0% | 15.4 | 1 | icf iid | 12 | 0 |
| AUDREY'S TLC, INC. | 2 |
| 0.0% | 66.1 | 1 | alf | — | 0 |
| AUGUSTANA LUTHERAN CHURCH | 2 |
| 0.0% | 25.4 | 1 | snf | 112 | 0 |
| AUT CT7 HOLDINGS LLC | 2 |
| 0.0% | 39.9 | 1 | snf | 180 | 0 |
| AUTUMN H MANOR, INC | 2 |
| 0.0% | 58.4 | 1 | alf | — | 2 |
| AUTUMN YEARS LLC | 2 |
| 0.0% | 60.2 | 1 | alf | — | 0 |
| Avalanche Care, Inc. | 2 |
| 0.0% | 50.4 | 1 | home health | — | 0 |
| AVANTI HOSPITALS LLC | 2 |
| 0.0% | 6.4 | 1 | snf | 94 | 0 |
| AVATAR ASSOCIATES LLC | 2 |
| 0.0% | 66.7 | 1 | home health | — | 0 |
| AVENDELLE CARE LLC | 2 |
| 0.0% | 79.2 | 1 | alf | — | 1 |
| AVERY PARTNERS INC | 2 |
| 0.0% | 64.8 | 1 | home health | — | 0 |
| AVERY TRITT HOLDINGS LLC | 2 |
| 0.0% | 41.8 | 1 | home health | — | 0 |
| AVIAN HOME HEALTH, LLC. | 2 |
| 0.0% | 38.6 | 1 | home health | — | 0 |
| AVIANT HEALTHCARE LLC | 2 |
| 50.0% | 87.6 | 2 | hospice | — | 0 |
| AVITA HEALTH SYSTEM | 2 |
| 0.0% | 39.4 | 1 | home health,hospice | — | 0 |
| AZZAM INVESTMENT & DEVELOPMENT , LLC | 2 |
| 0.0% | 16.3 | 1 | alf | — | 0 |
Grades are peer-group percentiles, so the grade mix is the comparable statistic. mean_percentile_position averages percentile positions across peer groups and should be read as a rough central tendency, not a score.