Chains / POINTE WOODS INVESTMENT LLC
POINTE WOODS INVESTMENT LLC Mean pctl position
66.3
blunt across peer groups
Grade mix Grades are peer-group percentiles, so the grade mix is the comparable statistic. mean_percentile_position averages percentile positions across peer groups and should be read as a rough central tendency, not a score.
Ownership graph Showing 3 of 3 facilities · 7 of 7 owner nodes · 19 of 19 current edges + − fit reset
SHERMAN, SAMUEL — ownership 33% — 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST SHERMAN, SAMUEL — ownership — OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL GOLDSTEIN, JEFFREY — ownership 33% — 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST SHERMAN, ALEXANDER — ownership 33% — 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST POINTE WOODS INVESTMENT LLC — ownership 100% — 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST CW PROPCO LLC — lease 100% — Individual has financial interest in both related organization and provider CW PROPCO LLC — lease 100% — Individual has financial interest in both related organization and provider GOLDSTEIN, JEFFREY — ownership 33% — 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST SHERMAN, SAMUEL — ownership 33% — 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST EP PROPCO — lease 100% — Individual has financial interest in both related organization and provider EP PROPCO — lease 100% — Individual has financial interest in both related organization and provider SHERMAN, ALEXANDER — ownership 33% — 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST POINTE WOODS INVESTMENT LLC — ownership 100% — 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST SHERMAN, SAMUEL — ownership 33% — 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST GOLDSTEIN, JEFFREY — ownership 33% — 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST POINTE WOODS INVESTMENT LLC — ownership 100% — 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST SHERMAN, ALEXANDER — ownership 33% — 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST LP PROPCO LLC — lease 100% — Individual has financial interest in both related organization and provider LP PROPCO LLC — lease 100% — Individual has financial interest in both related organization and provider POINTE WOODS INVESTMENT L… chain · 3 facilities CARDINAL WOODS SKILLED NURSING & REHAB CTR (OH snf) — score 97.6 — related-party real estate in cost report F CARDINAL WOODS SKILLED NURSING & … 97.6 P LAKE POINTE REHABILITATION AND NURSING CENTER (OH snf) — score 85.8 — related-party real estate in cost report D LAKE POINTE REHABILITATION AND NU… 85.8 P EAGLE POINTE SKILLED NURSING & REHAB (OH snf) — score 15.5 — related-party real estate in cost report A EAGLE POINTE SKILLED NURSING & RE… 15.5 P GOLDSTEIN, JEFFREY — ownership on 3 shown-chain facilities — up to 33%
5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST GOLDSTEIN, JEFFREY ownership · 3 fac. · ≤33% POINTE WOODS INVESTMENT LLC — ownership on 3 shown-chain facilities — up to 100%
5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST POINTE WOODS INVESTMENT LLC ownership · 3 fac. · ≤100% SHERMAN, ALEXANDER — ownership on 3 shown-chain facilities — up to 33%
5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST SHERMAN, ALEXANDER ownership · 3 fac. · ≤33% SHERMAN, SAMUEL — ownership on 3 shown-chain facilities — up to 33%
5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL SHERMAN, SAMUEL ownership · 3 fac. · ≤33% CW PROPCO LLC — lease on 1 shown-chain facilities — up to 100%
Individual has financial interest in both related organization and provider CW PROPCO LLC lease · 1 fac. · ≤100% EP PROPCO — lease on 1 shown-chain facilities — up to 100%
Individual has financial interest in both related organization and provider EP PROPCO lease · 1 fac. · ≤100% LP PROPCO LLC — lease on 1 shown-chain facilities — up to 100%
Individual has financial interest in both related organization and provider LP PROPCO LLC lease · 1 fac. · ≤100% P related-party real estate in cost reportdrag to pan · scroll to zoom · click a facility for its dossier
Owner nodes group ownership edges by the exact registered owner name; the same person or company filed under two spellings appears as two nodes, because merging them would be an editorial claim the registry does not make. Facility and owner lists are capped; caps and totals travel together so a partial graph cannot pass as a complete one. Facilities are prioritized riskiest-first by composite score.
By setting 1 Setting Facilities Grade mix Mean pctl snf 3
66.3
By state 1 State Facilities D/F count OH 3 2